Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a lessor can recover possession of leased premises occupied by the corporate debtor during moratorium under Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, even where the lease was terminated before commencement of CIRP.
Analysis: Section 14(1)(d) bars recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the corporate debtor. The protection is directed to the existing possession of the corporate debtor on the insolvency commencement date and is reinforced by the treatment of amounts due to affected persons as CIRP costs under Regulation 31(b) of the CIRP Regulations. The premises in question continued to be in the possession of the resolution professional for use by the corporate debtor, and the record showed that the premises were critical to the corporate debtor's operations as a going concern. The prior termination notice did not, by itself, permit restoration of possession to the lessor during moratorium.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to recovery of possession during the moratorium, and the claim for delivery of the leased premises was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the central question of restoration of possession during CIRP, and the moratorium protection under the insolvency code continued to bar eviction of the corporate debtor from the leased premises.
Ratio Decidendi: During moratorium, Section 14(1)(d) protects the corporate debtor's actual possession or occupation of property, and a lawful pre-CIRP termination of the lease does not by itself permit the lessor to recover such property while the premises remain in the corporate debtor's possession.