Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
