Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
