Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code bars a lessor from recovering leased premises during moratorium while the corporate debtor or resolution professional remains in possession, even if the lease was terminated before CIRP. The Tribunal read this protection with Regulation 31(b) and applied the distinction between physical occupation and juridical possession, holding that possession continuing after termination remains protected until lawful eviction. As the resolution professional admittedly remained in possession of the leased property, the lessor could not reclaim it during moratorium, and the claim for delivery of possession was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
