Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report in an anti-profiteering matter concerning construction services and additional input tax credit on the footing that the benefit had already been passed on to home-buyers by commensurate price reduction. After redetermination, the report found excess benefit had been passed to eligible buyers, and the differential amounts with interest due to the two complainants had been paid and acknowledged. As no other home-buyer objected to the report, no surviving basis remained to hold profiteering against the respondent, and no contravention of section 171 was made out.
The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report in an anti-profiteering matter concerning construction services and additional input tax credit on the footing that the benefit had already been passed on to home-buyers by commensurate price reduction. After redetermination, the report found excess benefit had been passed to eligible buyers, and the differential amounts with interest due to the two complainants had been paid and acknowledged. As no other home-buyer objected to the report, no surviving basis remained to hold profiteering against the respondent, and no contravention of section 171 was made out.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
