https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98503 The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report in an anti-profiteering matter concerning construction services and additional input tax credit on the footing that the benefit had already been passed on to home-buyers by commensurate price reduction. After redetermination, the report found excess benefit had been passed to eligible buyers, and the differential amounts with interest due to the two complainants had been paid and acknowledged. As no other home-buyer objected to the report, no surviving basis remained to hold profiteering against the respondent, and no contravention of section 171 was made out. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:45 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98503 The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report in an anti-profiteering matter concerning construction services and additional input tax credit on the footing that the benefit had already been passed on to home-buyers by commensurate price reduction. After redetermination, the report found excess benefit had been passed to eligible buyers, and the differential amounts with interest due to the two complainants had been paid and acknowledged. As no other home-buyer objected to the report, no surviving basis remained to hold profiteering against the respondent, and no contravention of section 171 was made out. Highlights GST Mon, 06 Apr 2026 08:51:45 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98503