Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
NCLAT held that a Section 7 CIRP application was not maintainable because the appellant failed to establish a financial debt under Section 5(8). The record did not show any disbursement to the corporate debtor against consideration for time value of money, or any transaction giving the alleged loan the commercial effect of borrowing; the appellant had borrowed in her own name against mortgage of her flat and repaid that loan herself. Authorities dealing with promoter support or guarantor recourse were found inapplicable. The rejection of the Section 7 application was therefore upheld, without prejudice to any other remedy available in law.
NCLAT held that a Section 7 CIRP application was not maintainable because the appellant failed to establish a financial debt under Section 5(8). The record did not show any disbursement to the corporate debtor against consideration for time value of money, or any transaction giving the alleged loan the commercial effect of borrowing; the appellant had borrowed in her own name against mortgage of her flat and repaid that loan herself. Authorities dealing with promoter support or guarantor recourse were found inapplicable. The rejection of the Section 7 application was therefore upheld, without prejudice to any other remedy available in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
