Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount paid by the director from a personal mortgage loan, subsequently repaid by sale of her property, constituted a financial debt owed by the corporate debtor so as to sustain an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The director had obtained the loan in her own name by mortgaging her personal property, and the board resolution only recorded that the company would avail mortgage finance on the director's property. The essential requirement under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is that the debt must be disbursed against consideration for the time value of money. On the facts, there was no direct disbursement by the director to the corporate debtor and no transaction showing that the corporate debtor had borrowed the amount from the director with any commercial effect of borrowing. The relied upon authority on stakeholder funding did not apply because the present case did not involve funds infused by the director into the company as a borrowing transaction.
Conclusion: The amount claimed did not constitute a financial debt and the Section 7 application was not maintainable. The appeal failed.