Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT held that a Section 7 CIRP application was not maintainable because the appellant failed to establish a financial debt under Section 5(8). The record did not show any disbursement to the corporate debtor against consideration for time value of money, or any transaction giving the alleged loan the commercial effect of borrowing; the appellant had borrowed in her own name against mortgage of her flat and repaid that loan herself. Authorities dealing with promoter support or guarantor recourse were found inapplicable. The rejection of the Section 7 application was therefore upheld, without prejudice to any other remedy available in law.
NCLAT held that a Section 7 CIRP application was not maintainable because the appellant failed to establish a financial debt under Section 5(8). The record did not show any disbursement to the corporate debtor against consideration for time value of money, or any transaction giving the alleged loan the commercial effect of borrowing; the appellant had borrowed in her own name against mortgage of her flat and repaid that loan herself. Authorities dealing with promoter support or guarantor recourse were found inapplicable. The rejection of the Section 7 application was therefore upheld, without prejudice to any other remedy available in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
