Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
