Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.