Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.