Classification of imported salvaged shaft pieces as ship parts confirmed, reassessment time-barred and appeal allowed restoring original classificatio...
Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7081 to 7100 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Transfer pricing disputes concerned reimbursements of personnel cost, IT-related expenses, advertisement and publicity expenses, and royalty. The Tribunal upheld deletion of adjustments on personnel cost and IT-related reimbursements because the assessee showed they were pure cost-to-cost items, with supporting material and no markup; the personnel-cost issue was also covered by the assessee's earlier years' orders. The Tribunal sustained the adjustment on advertisement and publicity reimbursement because the assessee failed to produce documentary evidence establishing the need for and incurrence of the . The royalty adjustment was deleted on consistency, the issue being covered by the assessee's own earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.