Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns may be dropped where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues, interest and late fee, as reflected in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules. The text notes that the cancellation power under Section 29(2)(c) extends to non-filing for six continuous months, but serious civil consequences justify permitting restoration on compliance. It also states that expiry of the revocation timeline was not treated as a bar in the circumstances discussed. The petitioner was given two months to approach the authority, which was directed to consider restoration expeditiously in accordance with law.
Cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns may be dropped where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues, interest and late fee, as reflected in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules. The text notes that the cancellation power under Section 29(2)(c) extends to non-filing for six continuous months, but serious civil consequences justify permitting restoration on compliance. It also states that expiry of the revocation timeline was not treated as a bar in the circumstances discussed. The petitioner was given two months to approach the authority, which was directed to consider restoration expeditiously in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
