Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5941 to 5960 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that a remand order requiring the show cause notice dated 8 February 2023 and the cancellation proceedings to be considered together had to be followed by the original authority, because both matters could affect the adjudication. The impugned order was passed without compliance with that appellate direction, so it was set aside. The proceedings were restored to the Joint Commissioner for fresh adjudication in accordance with the remand order and after granting the parties a fair opportunity of hearing, with all contentions left open.
The HC held that a remand order requiring the show cause notice dated 8 February 2023 and the cancellation proceedings to be considered together had to be followed by the original authority, because both matters could affect the adjudication. The impugned order was passed without compliance with that appellate direction, so it was set aside. The proceedings were restored to the Joint Commissioner for fresh adjudication in accordance with the remand order and after granting the parties a fair opportunity of hearing, with all contentions left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.