Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication order was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded in view of the earlier appellate remand directing simultaneous consideration of the pending show cause notices and grant of a fair hearing.
Analysis: The prior appellate order had remanded the matter for simultaneous decision of the show cause notices and expressly required a fresh adjudication after giving the assessee a fair opportunity and following natural justice. The impugned order had been passed before the appellate order was available to the concerned officer. In these circumstances, the original authority was bound to follow the appellate directions, since the pending notice and the cancellation proceedings had a direct bearing on the adjudication. A fresh hearing and decision in accordance with law was therefore necessary.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the proceedings were remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after hearing the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: When an appellate authority has remanded proceedings with a direction for simultaneous consideration and a fresh hearing, the adjudicating authority must adhere to that mandate, and an order passed without giving effect to it is liable to be set aside and remanded.