Condonation of Delay: Tribunal directed condonation where rectification proceedings were pursued, ordering merits adjudication after opportunity to be...
Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
A single show cause notice could not be enforced against both the former proprietorship and the later partnership firm for the post-conversion period, because the remand order required separate notices and no fresh notice to the partnership firm was shown; the later demand was therefore set aside. In works contract matters, a community hall intended for paid use and fruit and vegetable stalls were treated as having commercial character, so the claimed non-commercial exemption failed, while boundary walls, a public sports complex and related landscaping were held non-commercial on the dominant-use test. TDS and refundable security deposits were excluded from taxable value. Payment already made for EWS housing was left open to verification.
A single show cause notice could not be enforced against both the former proprietorship and the later partnership firm for the post-conversion period, because the remand order required separate notices and no fresh notice to the partnership firm was shown; the later demand was therefore set aside. In works contract matters, a community hall intended for paid use and fruit and vegetable stalls were treated as having commercial character, so the claimed non-commercial exemption failed, while boundary walls, a public sports complex and related landscaping were held non-commercial on the dominant-use test. TDS and refundable security deposits were excluded from taxable value. Payment already made for EWS housing was left open to verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
