Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2026 (4) TMI 67 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Service tax valuation and commercial construction limits shaped relief on later-period demand, TDS exclusion, and public-use works. Fresh show cause notice was required after remand before any later-period demand could be sustained against the partnership firm, so the demand for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Service tax valuation and commercial construction limits shaped relief on later-period demand, TDS exclusion, and public-use works.

                            Fresh show cause notice was required after remand before any later-period demand could be sustained against the partnership firm, so the demand for 2009-10 and 2010-11 was set aside. Construction of a community hall and fruit and vegetable stalls was treated as taxable commercial construction on the facts, so that demand was upheld. For valuation, statutory TDS deducted under income-tax law and refundable security deposits were not part of taxable value, while boundary walls, sports complex and landscaping were treated as non-commercial or public-use works and were not exigible to service tax. Verification was permitted for the EWS house payment.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the demand for the period 2009-10 and 2010-11 could survive against the partnership firm in the absence of a fresh show cause notice after remand. (ii) Whether the construction of a community hall and fruit and vegetable stalls was taxable as commercial construction. (iii) Whether TDS and refundable security amounts were includible in the taxable value, and whether boundary walls, sports complex and landscaping were exigible to service tax.

                            Issue (i): Whether the demand for the period 2009-10 and 2010-11 could survive against the partnership firm in the absence of a fresh show cause notice after remand.

                            Analysis: The earlier remand had specifically held that a single show cause notice covering both the erstwhile proprietorship concern and the newly formed partnership firm was not executable and had left it open to the Department to issue separate notices in accordance with law. The post-remand adjudication proceeded without any fresh notice addressed to the partnership firm for the later period. In that situation, the demand for the later financial years could not be sustained against the partnership firm.

                            Conclusion: The demand for 2009-10 and 2010-11 was set aside in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the construction of a community hall and fruit and vegetable stalls was taxable as commercial construction.

                            Analysis: The community hall was treated as a public utility and the record did not establish that it was non-commercial merely because it served public functions. The fruit and vegetable stalls were inherently commercial structures intended for trade. On the facts, the community hall and the stalls fell within taxable works executed for commercial use, while the assessee's plea of non-commercial character was not accepted.

                            Conclusion: The demand on these items was upheld against the assessee.

                            Issue (iii): Whether TDS and refundable security amounts were includible in the taxable value, and whether boundary walls, sports complex and landscaping were exigible to service tax.

                            Analysis: Service tax was held leviable on the gross amount charged under the valuation provision, but statutory TDS deducted and deposited under income-tax law did not represent consideration for the service and was not includible. Refundable security deposits also did not form part of taxable value. Boundary walls erected for public or semi-public use were treated as non-commercial works, and the Department failed to establish a commercial character. The sports complex and landscaping were found to be for public use and predominantly non-commercial, so the exemption or non-taxability adopted by the adjudicating authority was sustained. As regards the EWS house contracts, the assessee's payment was accepted subject to departmental verification.

                            Conclusion: TDS and refundable security amounts were excluded from valuation, the departmental challenge on boundary walls, sports complex and landscaping failed, and verification was permitted for the EWS house payment.

                            Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed, while the assessee obtained partial relief by having the later-period demand quashed and by securing exclusion or acceptance of specified valuation components, with certain demands on commercial construction sustained.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found