Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3981 to 4000 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A single show cause notice could not be enforced against both the former proprietorship and the later partnership firm for the post-conversion period, because the remand order required separate notices and no fresh notice to the partnership firm was shown; the later demand was therefore set aside. In works contract matters, a community hall intended for paid use and fruit and vegetable stalls were treated as having commercial character, so the claimed non-commercial exemption failed, while boundary walls, a public sports complex and related landscaping were held non-commercial on the dominant-use test. TDS and refundable security deposits were excluded from taxable value. Payment already made for EWS housing was left open to verification.
A single show cause notice could not be enforced against both the former proprietorship and the later partnership firm for the post-conversion period, because the remand order required separate notices and no fresh notice to the partnership firm was shown; the later demand was therefore set aside. In works contract matters, a community hall intended for paid use and fruit and vegetable stalls were treated as having commercial character, so the claimed non-commercial exemption failed, while boundary walls, a public sports complex and related landscaping were held non-commercial on the dominant-use test. TDS and refundable security deposits were excluded from taxable value. Payment already made for EWS housing was left open to verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
