International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.