Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.