Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Operation and management of Government health centres and polyclinics under a contractual arrangement with a PSU executing agency was treated as a taxable supply of contractual operational and managerial services. Entry 74 exemption for healthcare services by a clinical establishment was denied because the applicant itself was not supplying healthcare as the clinical establishment, and the payments were linked to centre-wise operational obligations rather than diagnosis or treatment. Entry 3 exemption for pure services was also unavailable because the supply was made to the PSU, not directly to Government, and the arrangement was composite rather than pure services. Receipts were characterised as contractual consideration, not grant or subsidy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
