Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
