https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98169 Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC. en-us Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:27 +0530 Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98169 Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC. Highlights IBC Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:27 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98169