Scope of intermediary status for data hosting services: tribunal finds provider not intermediary, services exported and not taxable, limited remand on...
CENVAT credit availability after omission of Rule 12B in textiles confirmed; late addendum to SCN introducing new grounds held time-barred and invalid...
Export of Wheat Flour and related products subject to online allocation, eligibility criteria, non-transferable six-month authorisations and reporting...
Straight-line lease rental accounting change results in penalty quashed where disclosed accounts and bona fide arguable accounting interpretation exis...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.