Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Withdrawal of CIRP before constitution of the CoC had to follow the IBC framework under section 12A and Regulation 30A, with the application made through the IRP and the corporate debtor represented by the IRP after admission of the section 7 petition. The Court noted that notice to the IRP and hearing of the IRP and objecting banks satisfied natural justice, and that the phrase "any person aggrieved" did not expand the class of persons entitled to a separate hearing at the withdrawal stage. It distinguished broader reliance on Glas Trust and found no exceptional breach of natural justice to justify writ intervention, leaving the petitioners to their statutory appeal remedy under the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
