Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors' alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor's commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.
Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors' alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor's commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.