<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 7 admission upheld where debt and default were proved, despite OTS rejection, delayed disbursal and pending arbitration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98042</link>
    <description>Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors&#039; alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor&#039;s commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:49:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:49:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 7 admission upheld where debt and default were proved, despite OTS rejection, delayed disbursal and pending arbitration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98042</link>
      <description>Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors&#039; alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor&#039;s commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:49:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>