Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors' alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor's commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.
Section 7 admission was upheld because debt and default were established and the application was procedurally complete; the Adjudicating Authority was not required to investigate the causes of default or creditors' alleged role in delayed disbursal. Rejection of an OTS proposal did not bar initiation of CIRP, as settlement decisions remained within the creditor's commercial discretion. Omission of a specific date of default was not fatal where defaults were otherwise proved, and Section 10A was not attracted because the relevant defaults pre-dated the moratorium. Pending arbitration and allegations of recovery motive did not prevent insolvency proceedings on these facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.