Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.