Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.