Condonation of Delay denied: communication lapses and corporate restructuring found insufficient; prolonged inaction and lack of bona fides led to ref...
Export Support intervention INSIGHT launched to provide non financial capacity building, trade intelligence and pilot support with defined funding and...
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Article 24(4) (non-discrimination) of the India-Denmark DTAA precludes a domestic thin-capitalisation measure that differentiates deductibility of interest based on creditor residence; applying treaty supremacy via section 90(2) the Tribunal concluded the section 94B disallowance could not be sustained where the debt and interest were accepted as arm's-length. The note further records computational principles: EBITDA must reflect gross (actual) depreciation, not netting by subvention; only interest actually deductible may be counted for the statutory limit; notional Ind AS accretion and interest already disallowed as capital must be excluded from the section 94B computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.