Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
An assessing officer must not treat the value adopted by the registering/stamp valuation authority as deemed sale consideration under Section 50C without referring the matter to the departmental Valuation Officer/Valuation Cell to determine fair market value; where the assessee disputed the adopted value and did not participate, the AO should still use the statutory valuation machinery and afford the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to produce fresh documentary evidence. The assessment was set aside and remitted for valuation by the DVO and recomputation of short term capital gains in accordance with law after hearing the assessee.
An assessing officer must not treat the value adopted by the registering/stamp valuation authority as deemed sale consideration under Section 50C without referring the matter to the departmental Valuation Officer/Valuation Cell to determine fair market value; where the assessee disputed the adopted value and did not participate, the AO should still use the statutory valuation machinery and afford the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard and to produce fresh documentary evidence. The assessment was set aside and remitted for valuation by the DVO and recomputation of short term capital gains in accordance with law after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.