Classification of imported goods as electronic cigarette versus tobacco product reversed for lack of proof; order set aside for jurisdictional overrea...
Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Seizure of consignments by the surveillance team violated the Standard Operating Procedure applicable during the Model Code of Conduct; consequently the handover to Revenue was vitiated and the High Court's finding to that effect is sustained, with release directed to Sequel Logistics as the person from whom the goods were seized. A notice issued in reassessment proceedings against the courier employee was arbitrary because he was a custodian not shown to be owner, and was quashed. Third party ownership claims must be pursued under the statutory requisition/claim procedure rather than by writ.
Seizure of consignments by the surveillance team violated the Standard Operating Procedure applicable during the Model Code of Conduct; consequently the handover to Revenue was vitiated and the High Court's finding to that effect is sustained, with release directed to Sequel Logistics as the person from whom the goods were seized. A notice issued in reassessment proceedings against the courier employee was arbitrary because he was a custodian not shown to be owner, and was quashed. Third party ownership claims must be pursued under the statutory requisition/claim procedure rather than by writ.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
