<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Seizure SOP breach during Model Code: consignments released to courier; ownership disputes to be adjudicated under statutory requisition procedure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97950</link>
    <description>Seizure of consignments by the surveillance team violated the Standard Operating Procedure applicable during the Model Code of Conduct; consequently the handover to Revenue was vitiated and the High Court&#039;s finding to that effect is sustained, with release directed to Sequel Logistics as the person from whom the goods were seized. A notice issued in reassessment proceedings against the courier employee was arbitrary because he was a custodian not shown to be owner, and was quashed. Third party ownership claims must be pursued under the statutory requisition/claim procedure rather than by writ.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Seizure SOP breach during Model Code: consignments released to courier; ownership disputes to be adjudicated under statutory requisition procedure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97950</link>
      <description>Seizure of consignments by the surveillance team violated the Standard Operating Procedure applicable during the Model Code of Conduct; consequently the handover to Revenue was vitiated and the High Court&#039;s finding to that effect is sustained, with release directed to Sequel Logistics as the person from whom the goods were seized. A notice issued in reassessment proceedings against the courier employee was arbitrary because he was a custodian not shown to be owner, and was quashed. Third party ownership claims must be pursued under the statutory requisition/claim procedure rather than by writ.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>