Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
