Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
