Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
