Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Assignment of leasehold rights in a GIDC-allotted plot constitutes an interest in immovable property and, when assigned for consideration, operates as a transfer of immovable property rather than a supply of service. The court applied prior reasoning that such transfers fall outside the scope of GST under the statutory scheme and relevant schedules/notifications, with the result that GST liability and related demands premised on treating the assignment as a taxable service do not arise. Accordingly the show-cause notice and demand order were quashed and the petition allowed; input tax credit issues therefore do not arise.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
