Transfer pricing comparables selection and working capital adjustment u/r 10B(1)(e)(iii), remanded for recomputation with rejected comparables include...
Company oppression/mismanagement petition amendments and maintainability after alleged share transfer and forgery claims; tribunal order quashed for l...
Exercise of revisional power under section 263 is limited to orders that are not merely erroneous but prejudicial to revenue; a mere difference of opinion between the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner cannot justify setting aside, modifying or remanding an assessment, and the Commissioner must record reasons specifying how and to what extent the assessment is prejudicial. On addition of alleged cash credits under section 68, the AO had examined partners' accounts and sources and recorded satisfaction as to genuineness; that factual satisfaction was not shown to be prejudicial, so interference was unwarranted and the appeal was dismissed.
Exercise of revisional power under section 263 is limited to orders that are not merely erroneous but prejudicial to revenue; a mere difference of opinion between the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner cannot justify setting aside, modifying or remanding an assessment, and the Commissioner must record reasons specifying how and to what extent the assessment is prejudicial. On addition of alleged cash credits under section 68, the AO had examined partners' accounts and sources and recorded satisfaction as to genuineness; that factual satisfaction was not shown to be prejudicial, so interference was unwarranted and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
