Section 263 power requires recorded satisfaction that an assessment is prejudicial to revenue; lack of specific findings invalidates interference.

The note addresses exercise of Section 263 powers to revise income-tax assessments and holds that interference requires a recorded satisfaction that the assessment order is prejudicial to revenue; where the Assessing Officer had examined accounts and partner capital credits and no specific findings were recorded by the Commissioner as to how the assessment was prejudicial, setting aside the assessment was unjustified. The Tribunal's decision to quash the Commissioner's exercise of Section 263 was upheld and the outcome favoured the assessee, with remand and fresh assessment not warranted absent precise prejudice findings.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of assessment year 1997-98.

Analysis: The matter concerns exercise of powers under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which allows interference only if the assessment order is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The assessment order dated 16.3.2000 recorded the assessee's income and the Assessing Officer examined the accounts and the source of partner contributions, including examination of the account of a partner engaged in the same trade. The Commissioner set aside the assessment and remanded for fresh assessment without recording specific findings as to the extent or manner in which the order was prejudicial to revenue. The statutory requirement under section 68 for recording satisfaction about genuineness of credit entries was considered, but the facts disclose partner capital contributions and investigation by the Assessing Officer into those credits. The notification relied upon for tax-effect threshold was considered but did not lead to dismissal. Given the Assessing Officer had examined the accounts and there was no specific recorded finding by the Commissioner demonstrating that the assessment was prejudicial to revenue, interference under section 263 was not justified.

Conclusion: The appeal is dismissed and the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax's order under section 263 is upheld; decision is in favour of the assessee.

---