Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether rights under a buyer/allotment agreement constitute a transfer taxable as capital gains was decided by applying the statutory definitions of capital asset and transfer, with emphasis on clauses covering part performance and transactions enabling enjoyment of immovable property. The Tribunal found the assessee held enforceable rights from allotment and that the executed agreement to sell effected a transfer within the statutory definition; consequently the receipts were assessable under capital gains. The assessee's claimed indexed cost exceeded consideration, producing an allowable long-term capital loss, and the appeal was allowed on that basis.
Whether rights under a buyer/allotment agreement constitute a transfer taxable as capital gains was decided by applying the statutory definitions of capital asset and transfer, with emphasis on clauses covering part performance and transactions enabling enjoyment of immovable property. The Tribunal found the assessee held enforceable rights from allotment and that the executed agreement to sell effected a transfer within the statutory definition; consequently the receipts were assessable under capital gains. The assessee's claimed indexed cost exceeded consideration, producing an allowable long-term capital loss, and the appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.