Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Disciplinary scrutiny of an interim resolution professional focused on alleged misrepresentation, concealment and reconstitution of the committee of creditors without approval. The tribunal found the IRP was given specific directions and an opportunity to explain discrepancies but did not avail the chances; therefore observations characterising the IRP's conduct as prejudicial to the corporate insolvency resolution process were supported by the record. The request to expunge adverse observations for breach of natural justice was rejected and the appeals were dismissed.
Disciplinary scrutiny of an interim resolution professional focused on alleged misrepresentation, concealment and reconstitution of the committee of creditors without approval. The tribunal found the IRP was given specific directions and an opportunity to explain discrepancies but did not avail the chances; therefore observations characterising the IRP's conduct as prejudicial to the corporate insolvency resolution process were supported by the record. The request to expunge adverse observations for breach of natural justice was rejected and the appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.