<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Right to be heard: IRP given opportunity but failed to explain discrepancies; adverse observations upheld and appeals dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97840</link>
    <description>Disciplinary scrutiny of an interim resolution professional focused on alleged misrepresentation, concealment and reconstitution of the committee of creditors without approval. The tribunal found the IRP was given specific directions and an opportunity to explain discrepancies but did not avail the chances; therefore observations characterising the IRP&#039;s conduct as prejudicial to the corporate insolvency resolution process were supported by the record. The request to expunge adverse observations for breach of natural justice was rejected and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Right to be heard: IRP given opportunity but failed to explain discrepancies; adverse observations upheld and appeals dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97840</link>
      <description>Disciplinary scrutiny of an interim resolution professional focused on alleged misrepresentation, concealment and reconstitution of the committee of creditors without approval. The tribunal found the IRP was given specific directions and an opportunity to explain discrepancies but did not avail the chances; therefore observations characterising the IRP&#039;s conduct as prejudicial to the corporate insolvency resolution process were supported by the record. The request to expunge adverse observations for breach of natural justice was rejected and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>