Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5541 to 5560 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment in the earlier company name was held valid where the assessee's own communications continued to use the old name, creating a bona fide impression on the tax authority; consequently the assessment was not void. Separately, additions treating subscribed share capital and premium as not genuine were sustained because the offered valuation was unacceptable, investor creditworthiness and non-responses were unsatisfactory, and the transactional sequence indicated profiteering through transfer; therefore the premium component was disallowed and additions upheld under the tax provisions addressing non-genuine share allotments and deemed income.
Assessment in the earlier company name was held valid where the assessee's own communications continued to use the old name, creating a bona fide impression on the tax authority; consequently the assessment was not void. Separately, additions treating subscribed share capital and premium as not genuine were sustained because the offered valuation was unacceptable, investor creditworthiness and non-responses were unsatisfactory, and the transactional sequence indicated profiteering through transfer; therefore the premium component was disallowed and additions upheld under the tax provisions addressing non-genuine share allotments and deemed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
