Disallowance under tax law for investment expenses cannot be applied mechanically; authority must record clear reasons before increasing assessee's su...
Assessment in the earlier company name was held valid where the assessee's own communications continued to use the old name, creating a bona fide impression on the tax authority; consequently the assessment was not void. Separately, additions treating subscribed share capital and premium as not genuine were sustained because the offered valuation was unacceptable, investor creditworthiness and non-responses were unsatisfactory, and the transactional sequence indicated profiteering through transfer; therefore the premium component was disallowed and additions upheld under the tax provisions addressing non-genuine share allotments and deemed income.
Assessment in the earlier company name was held valid where the assessee's own communications continued to use the old name, creating a bona fide impression on the tax authority; consequently the assessment was not void. Separately, additions treating subscribed share capital and premium as not genuine were sustained because the offered valuation was unacceptable, investor creditworthiness and non-responses were unsatisfactory, and the transactional sequence indicated profiteering through transfer; therefore the premium component was disallowed and additions upheld under the tax provisions addressing non-genuine share allotments and deemed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
