Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 270A was deleted where the assessee claimed deduction for Health and Education Cess on a bona fide legal view supported by existing High Court precedents, fully disclosed the claim in the return, and voluntarily withdrew the claim during assessment after a retrospective statutory explanation was introduced. Applying the principle that a claim made on a debatable legal interpretation with full disclosure and without concealment does not attract penalty, the case falls within the non-penalising scope of the relevant proviso, leading to deletion of the penalty.
Penalty under section 270A was deleted where the assessee claimed deduction for Health and Education Cess on a bona fide legal view supported by existing High Court precedents, fully disclosed the claim in the return, and voluntarily withdrew the claim during assessment after a retrospective statutory explanation was introduced. Applying the principle that a claim made on a debatable legal interpretation with full disclosure and without concealment does not attract penalty, the case falls within the non-penalising scope of the relevant proviso, leading to deletion of the penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.