<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bona fide legal claim based on prevailing precedents avoided penalty when fully disclosed and voluntarily withdrawn.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97733</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A was deleted where the assessee claimed deduction for Health and Education Cess on a bona fide legal view supported by existing High Court precedents, fully disclosed the claim in the return, and voluntarily withdrew the claim during assessment after a retrospective statutory explanation was introduced. Applying the principle that a claim made on a debatable legal interpretation with full disclosure and without concealment does not attract penalty, the case falls within the non-penalising scope of the relevant proviso, leading to deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bona fide legal claim based on prevailing precedents avoided penalty when fully disclosed and voluntarily withdrawn.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97733</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A was deleted where the assessee claimed deduction for Health and Education Cess on a bona fide legal view supported by existing High Court precedents, fully disclosed the claim in the return, and voluntarily withdrew the claim during assessment after a retrospective statutory explanation was introduced. Applying the principle that a claim made on a debatable legal interpretation with full disclosure and without concealment does not attract penalty, the case falls within the non-penalising scope of the relevant proviso, leading to deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:42:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>