Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6121 to 6140 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO's independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on 'borrowed satisfaction' from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors' audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.
Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO's independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on 'borrowed satisfaction' from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors' audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.