<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening assessments: lack of independent application of mind invalidates s147/148 notices; section 68 additions deleted on proof.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97678</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO&#039;s independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on &#039;borrowed satisfaction&#039; from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors&#039; audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening assessments: lack of independent application of mind invalidates s147/148 notices; section 68 additions deleted on proof.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97678</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment was invalidated for lack of tangible material and the AO&#039;s independent application of mind; the notice under section 147/148 rested on &#039;borrowed satisfaction&#039; from the investigation wing without requisite nexus or reasoned inference of escapement and therefore failed the four essential ingredients for reopening. On merits, share application monies treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 were deleted: the assessee produced confirmations, bank statements and investors&#039; audited accounts and sought summonses, and the Tribunal found the evidentiary onus discharged despite limited third party noncompliance.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 08:36:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>